top of page

When I first tried Claude AI, the onboarding felt slightly off. The text was a bit hard to read, and the layout didn’t guide me clearly, making the experience feel less polished.

When I first tried Claude AI, the onboarding felt slightly off. The text was a bit hard to read, and the layout didn’t guide me clearly, making the experience feel less polished.

When I first tried Claude AI, the onboarding felt slightly off. The text was a bit hard to read, and the layout didn’t guide me clearly, making the experience feel less polished.

Claude AI Onboarding — Small UX Redesign

My Role: Product Designer |  Duration: 7 days |  Platform: Website |  Tools: Figma     

Current Onboarding

When I first tried Claude AI for UI/UX help, I was honestly surprised—the onboarding felt off. The text was hard to read, and the layout didn’t guide me clearly, which made the experience feel less polished than I expected.

Current Onboarding:

Original Onboarding screen

Group 7.jpg

   Here, we see quite a lot of design flaws.

​

  • Low CTA Prominence
    → The call-to-action button lacks visual weight, making it easy to overlook.

  • Insufficient Visual Breathing Space
    → The onboarding screen feels cramped, with limited spacing between elements.

  • Imbalanced Layout
    → UI elements appear tightly stacked, reducing clarity and overall visual harmony.

  • Weak Visual Flow (Top → Bottom)
    → The CTA feels visually attached to the content, disrupting a natural downward scanning pattern.

  • Reduced Readability
    → Text blocks appear dense and lack sufficient contrast with the background (contrast ratio: 8.22:1), affecting legibility.

So, I redesigned the Onboarding screen considering the design flaws one by one

Improved Onboarding

Improved Onboarding(Redesigned):

Redesigned Onboarding screen

Group 8 (2).jpg

   Here is what the redesigned screen exhibits:

​

  • Stronger CTA visibility
    → Larger, clearer button with better prominence

  • Improved spacing
    → More breathing room between sections which makes it less cramped.

  • Better layout balance
    → Content feels more evenly distributed.

  • Clearer visual flow
    → Natural top-to-bottom progression ending at CTA.

  • Slightly better readability
    → Spacing improves scanability, and the higher text–background contrast ratio (14.4:1) significantly enhances readability and accessibility

Onboarding Comparison

Onboarding Comparison:

Original Onboarding screen         VS        Redesigned Onboarding screen

Group 7.jpg
Group 8 (2).jpg
Design Decisions

Design Decisions:

Usability Insights
  • Increased CTA prominence and text emphasis
    The button size, spacing, and bold CTA label were enhanced to improve visibility and emphasis compared to the original.
    Goal: make the primary action immediately noticeable and reduce decision friction.

​

  • Improved spacing and layout structure
    Vertical spacing between sections was increased to create clear separation.
    → Goal: reduce cognitive load and allow users to process content in chunks.

​

  • Enhanced text contrast (14.4:1)
    Adjusted text color against the background to meet high accessibility standards.
    → Goal: improve readability for all users, including low-vision scenarios.

​

  • Established clearer visual flow
    Layout structured to guide users from heading → information → CTA smoothly.
    → Goal: create a natural progression toward action.

​

  • Optimized content grouping
    Related information was visually grouped more clearly instead of appearing as one continuous block.
    → Goal: improve scanability and help users quickly understand key points.

​

​

Usability Insights:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the redesign, I conducted a quick preference test with users by showing both onboarding screens and asking a few targeted questions.

Questions included:

  • Which screen would you prefer to use daily?

  • Which screen is clearer in communicating its purpose?

  • Which screen feels easier to read and understand?

Results

usability_pie_chart_pastel_edited.jpg
  • 85% of users preferred the redesigned onboarding screen

  • Users found the redesigned version clearer and easier to process

  • The CTA was more noticeable, helping users identify the next step faster

Key Takeways

 

 

  • ​Improved spacing and structure led to better scanability

  • Higher contrast enhanced readability and accessibility

  • Stronger CTA emphasis resulted in clearer action guidance

Conclusion

Conclusion:

By refining spacing, contrast, and CTA prominence, the onboarding experience becomes more scannable and action-oriented, leading to higher user preference and better initial engagement.

bottom of page